Monday, February 3, 2014

MNJUDICIALTAR: The Republican Party left me; Time for me to fly!

John Boehner and Mitch McConnell
When Ronald Reagan left the Democrat Party to become a Republican, he explained:
“I didn’t leave the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party left me!”
20+ years ago, this writer left the Democratic Party for the Republican Party. And 20+ years later, this writer finds himself wanting to say:
“I didn’t leave the Republican Party, the Republican Party left me!”
Before, we go farther; this writer would simply state that Boehner and the GOP Establishment joining the Democrats in dissing the TEA Party was merely the “last straw”.

Now before you Democrats settle in to enjoy the bloodletting to come in this article, know that I left the Democratic Party because of the innate corruption of the Democratic party. Elected Democrats who were supposed to stand for justice and fight for the best interests of Americans, in fact merely pretended to do so. In my particular case, this writer alleges that former US Attorney David Lee Lillehaug, a deceased Senator, and the deceased Senators then Chief of Staff, Jeff Blodgett, abandoned their oaths of office and/or duty to WE THE PEOPLE by joining a criminal conspiracy and the subsequent conspiracy to obstruct justice. You can read more about this writer’s allegations here:
And because this writer has experienced the duplicity of both major political parties, this quote seems more appropriate:

“The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. One word of truth outweighs the world.”
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (political dissent in former USSR)
This writer changed parties 20+ years with the intent of making sure the injustice he and others targeted by the criminal conspiracy could not be inflicted by anyone else in the future. For the past 12 years, this writer has intensely pursued passage and adoption of these Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) resolutions into the Republican Platform:
The reader, or at least those readers who are lawyers, will recognize that these Judicial TAR Resolutions evidence.....

To continue reading for free, please click here http://t.co/dauWMzBSqF

Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.

Sunday, February 2, 2014

MNJUDICIALTAR: Another Scam in the Minnesota perverse Meritocracy. Part 1 of 2

Associate Justice David Lee Lillehaug
This article revisits this writer’s assertion that promotions and rewards within our government and political parties do not happen as rewards for serving the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE. Rather they occur for maintaining the facade that our government promotes the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE, while actually promoting the best interests of the wealthy and corporate ruling class.

This article is presented as part of a continuing series of articles intended to provide American Citizens with information and reporting necessary for them to retake our country, and restore our Constitution, Natural Law, the Rule of Law and our Bill of Rights.

This writer's attention was brought to this article by the following news story.
'Pro bono' legal work for 2011 shutdown cost Minnesota $77,000 http://strib.mn/1dkPgCK
The above referenced, heavily spun article discusses how Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton, in kind of an off the books way, paid David Lee Lillehaug's $77,000 for work that was supposed to be done for free. Because of the "accounting discrepancy" this controverys did not arise until a couple of weeks ago.

David Lee Lillehaug and this writer's paths had crossed many years ago. This story reaffirmed this writer's low opinion of David Lee Lillehaug. And this two part series, will likely have Minnesota Citizens and rank and file Democrats with a new perspective of reality regarding their government and Democratic Party respectively.
The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it. – John Hay (1872)
This article takes place at the intersection of fraud perpetrated upon Charities and Pension funds by a certain bank, as well as that bank's participation in the wrongful repossession of vehicles from 150-200 Minnesota families. The reader is advised that they can find the documentation to this writer’s allegations with the Minneapolis FBI, and in Hennepin County Court Cases Bank North vs 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA is 27CV88-22383, Citizens State Bank of St. Louis Park vs. 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA 91-002759, Don Mashak vs Norwest Bank 93-016429. This writer will post specific proofs and documents at the follow url in the next few days http://goo.gl/BGA8Hy. At the time, Wells Fargo Bank, NA was called Norwest Bank, Na.

The actors in this great play include this writer, current Minnesota Supreme Court Judge David Lee Lillehaug, former Chief of Staff to a now deceased US Senator, Jeff Blodgett, the unnamed deceased Senator, then Wells Fargo Bank (Wells Fargo) President Richard Kovacevich , Wells Fargo Board member Daniel-Saklad, Wells Fargo Lawyer Sherry Hellerman-Gould, former First National Bank of Anoka, NA (FNA)President William Bunker and FNA’s VP Roger Oakerman. (There are other players but this is the short list)

This writer asserts that US Attorney David Lee Lillehaug refused to pursue this writer’s allegations 20+ years ago of the wrongful repossession of 150-200 vehicles from innocent Minnesota families and the subsequent escalating witness tampering threats which culminated in death threats. This writer asserts that if now US Minnesota Supreme Court Judge David Lillehaug had pursued this writer’s allegations 20 years ago, Wells Fargo Bank, NA would not have went on to savage various charities and pension funds later...

To continue reading for free, please click here http://t.co/RqAjhmO2Ee

Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.

Friday, January 31, 2014

MNJUDICIALTAR: UNIFIED THEORY OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS

Most Americans feel something has changed, and not for the better, in America. But ask them what exactly has changed and how the change occurred, and most can only give a general impression of a loss of liberty and expansion of government power and control.

It is this writer’s belief that his Unified Theory of American Government and Politics will help his fellow American understand what is changing, how it is being changed and how they can resist change they oppose. Now this writer has collected enough information to write a book, but in deference to constructive and less constructive feedback about the length of some of his articles, this article will be a summary of this theory. (And I will write the book in the future). The Importance of getting this information into the minds of the American masses outweight any personal economic considerations.

This writer politely suggests the reader will get more out of this article if they read these 2 previous articles first:
To understand foundation of American Government, it is necessary to how our current American Government came to be. We will look at aspects of the government that preceded our Republic and examine and compare those same aspects as they occurred in the early Republic. We will compare these aspects of Governance under:
  1. Divine Right of Kings – Pre-American Revolution
  2. Consent of the Governed – Early America
  3. Progressivism – Current Day America
For our purposes, we are going to go back to the fall of the Roman Empire 476 AD.
In Western Europe, following the fall of Rome an economic system know as Feudalism and a Governance Doctrine Known as the Divine Right of Kings evolved into being.

DIVINE RIGHT OF KINGS

The Governance Doctrine of Divine Right of Kings stated essentially:
The King is a God or the representative of God here on earth, and, therefore no earthly being can question his decisions.

NO RIGHTS

All property belonged to the King. People upon the Kings property were subjects as opposed to citizens. Subjects do not have rights; they obtain permissions and/or privileges from the King or the Kings representative.
NO PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS

None besides the King owned property; they obtained the King’s permission to be upon it and/or were granted the privilege of managing a particular piece of property for the King in exchange for loyalty, payments and soldiers for the King’s Army. In short, almost the entire wealth of the country belonged to the King.
SUBJECTS

The vast majority of people were peasants. Under the economic system of Manorial Feudalism peasants were essentially tied to a parcel of land. In effect, they were the property of the King and whomsoever the King appointed to manage that land.

CLASS SYSTEM

Various Class systems existed. The sharpest division was the King and his subjects. But to control all of his lands and subjects, the King had to delegate authority to others to administer sections of his Kingdoms. From this arose an aristocracy; initially just the trusted Administrators of the King’s Property and/or governmental affairs.

Though they did not think of it like this at the time, Aristocrats essentially traded the liberty of the masses for their own personal gain. Even if the King was wrong, they most usually went along to get along to keep their privileges and permissions. Little or no thought was given to the quality of life of the lower classes. And any conflicts of conscience between the King and the peasants were quickly decided in the favor of the King. Perhaps the key thought to take from this paragraph is that the King cannot maintain control without the support of the lower hierarchy. The King and the aristocracy were mutually dependent on each other to maintain their power and privilege and enforce their will on the masses.

As the Governance Doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings matured, another class of persons emerged called “Freedmen” or “Freemen” These often were merchants or tradesmen with enough wealth to be able to support and free themselves.

SELF DETERMINATION

There was little or no Self-Determination. An individual’s life was most predicted by the class or status they were born into. Life was so harsh and existence so close to the margins, that most could not afford the consequences of challenging the social order. Your profession was most likely to be that of your father. If you were born the son of a blacksmith, more than likely you would grow up to be a blacksmith. If you were born the daughter of a blacksmith, you father would likely arrange a marriage with for you with someone of similar class and status. There were exceptions, to be sure, but the upward mobility experienced in the first 225 years of the American Republic did not exist under Feudalism and the Divine Right of Kings.

Without Self-Determination, the day to day, month to month and year to year elements of living became settled tradition. And tradition and superstition became the reasons and restraints to those that dare dream of their life being something more.

ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUTH

Truth was established by the King and the Church. The truth the King and the Church established could not be challenged. From your history you remember persons being excommunicated, punished, burned at the stake, or otherwise being killed for challenging Church Doctrine. People were killed for....

To continue reading for free, please click here http://t.co/UuIarnOHk9
 
Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.

Monday, January 27, 2014

MNJUDICIALTAR: SHERIFF OF NOTTINGHAM VS FIAT MONEY

So much talk lately about the increasing disparity in wealth. And, once again, this writer is going to turn your perspective of reality on its head. Today we will show you one of the many ways your government and ruling class steal value from labor, without labor even noticing. This is the true source of the growing wealth disparity.
  • “All wealth is created by Labor” – John Locke
  • “All value is created by Labor” – Don Mashak
Even land and gold have no value unless and until labor is applied to it. Gold has no value until dug out of the ground and Land has no value until labor is used to hunt a deer, harvest crops, dig an oil well or build a house, etc.
  • “The value created only by labor is as much the property as gold and land is” – Don Mashak
  • “Government has no other end, but preservation of property” - John Locke
SHERIFF OF NOTTINGHAM

In days of old, governments and/or the ruling class had to physically collect taxes, etc from the masses. A means to finesse taking property from the masses without them noticing the taking had not yet been invented. This writer has selected Sheriff of Nottingham to represent the Tax Collector as he is well known to all from the various stories of Robinhood.

In reality, low level tax collectors collected the majority of the taxes and called upon the Sheriff to only collect from those who could not or would not pay the tax. Upon being informed, the Sheriff of Nottingham would then engage in a series of escalating interactions designed to induce payment and/or seize property of the person owing the tax.

But there was a drawback to this practice. To state the obvious, when the Sheriff of Nottingham seized someone’s coins, wheat, corn, chickens, goat or Ox, etc, people noticed. The physicality of these tax collection actions raised angst and fomented rebellion amongst the masses.
And after a few uprisings and rebellions, someone thought: “There must be a better, less obvious way to take money from the masses.”
FIAT MONEY

First it must be remembered that the concept of money was invented and became popular because it simplified transactions between persons. For example, instead of bringing your cow with you to trade for wood at the Lumber Yard; it was much easier to bring money. Further, the parties did not have to haggle how many boards a particular cow was worth. With a standard form of money, over time the free market established the fair market value of almost every commodity in terms of the unit of money. And finally, the
Lumber Yard owner was not left with a cow that had to be fed and cared for.

Fiat money is money that is not back by specie, such as gold and silver. In other words, for each dollar the government prints it is required to purchase a dollar’s worth of specie and keep it in the government vault.

THE BENEVOLENT GOVERNMENT AND NON-FIAT MONEY

In the first year of money under a benevolent government, (for the sole purpose of simplifying economic transactions between persons (and making tax collection easier) the government would create an amount of money equal to the value of the products the country produced. In this benevolent government, the money is NOT fiat money; it is backed by gold.

For our example, we are going to have a very simple economy. The only things people produce are cows and jumpsuits. The only thing that people need to live are cows to eat and jumpsuits to wear. For our example, Cows are consumed and jumpsuits wear out in one year, but money never wears out and is never lost.

In the year before the government implements “money”, the barter rate is 2 jumpsuits to exchange for 1 cow. Taxes to the government are half a cow or 1 jumpsuit for each adult citizen.

In year 1, the country produces 100 new cows and 100 new jumpsuits. To facilitate the use of money instead of barter, the government puts a total of $300 into circulation. Based on last year’s barter exchange rate, the fair market value of each cow should be 2 dollars and that of jumpsuits should be 1 dollar. Taxes for each adult is 1 dollar.

In year 2, the country produces the same number of 100 cows and 100 jumpsuits, so there is no need for the government to add more money to the economy. The price of each cow and jumpsuits remain unchanged
In year 3, the country produces 110 new cows and 110 new jumpsuits. To keep prices stable, the government puts 30 more new dollars to the economy. (As in our example, money never wears out and is never lost; the amount of money in circulation is 330 dollars.) The price of cows remains 2 dollars and jumpsuits remains at 1 dollar. Taxes to the government remain 1 dollar.
Ad infinitum…

While our example over simplifies the US Monetary system, all of the other elements that actually exist only cloud the net effect that will be demonstrated. Even when added into the mix, these other elements do not substantially offset the negative effect which is about to be exposed. Neither does expanding the range of products produced or consumed does not negate the detrimental effect about to be exposed.

THE MALEVOLENT GOVERNMENT AND FIAT MONEY

Our malevolent government is identical to the benevolent government example, except that it uses fiat money and will print more of it. Our malevolent government using Fiat Money means that instead of buying more gold to back additional money the government prints, it only has to buy more ink and paper.

The year before year 1 with “money” is the same as year 1 under the benevolent government: the barter rate is 2 jumpsuits to exchange for 1 cow. Taxes for the government are half a cow or 1 jumpsuit for each adult citizen.

Year 1 of “money” under the malevolent government is also the same as year 1 of “money” with the benevolent government. The country produces 100 new cows and 100 new jumpsuits. To facilitate the use of money instead of barter, the government puts a total of $300 into circulation. Based on last year’s barter exchange rate, the fair market value of each cow should be 2 dollars and that of jumpsuits should be 1 dollar. Taxes for each adult is 1 dollar.

In year 2, the malevolent malignancy reveals....

To continue reading for free, click here http://t.co/U4YrK7Ih7n
 
Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.

Saturday, January 25, 2014

MNJUDICIALTAR: Married? The Judicial Assault on your Unalienable, Natural Law Rights

Though this article focuses on the departures from the Rule of Law in the Divorce case of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki vs. David Rucki, this writer takes a broader perspective. That broader being one addressing the importance of enforcing adherence to the the Rule of Law and Due Process; both of which are not only statutory requirements but Constitutional and Natural Law Rights of every person. (Before we go farther, this writer asserts that he would write the same article if the roles of the parties were reversed.) This article is a follow up to the latest hearing relating to this matter from January 10, 2014 and a call to action for the upcoming January 27, 2014 hearing for Lawyer Michelle MacDonald.

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Martin Luther King Jr.,

[The next round in this battle against injustice occurs, Monday, January 27, 2014 at 9 AM Dakota County District Court, 1560 Highway 55, Hastings, MN. State of Minnesota v. Michelle MacDonald Shimota, Court file no. 19HA-CR-13-2934]

Let us begin with an intellectual and emotional appetizer intended to make you non-lawyer types hungry for the rest of the story.
Imagine finding yourself in this scenario, you and your spouse have been married nearly 20 years. You have built a successful business and have five children. To settle the Divorce, you agree to take the family home of 14 years and have custody of your 5 children while letting your spouse have parenting time, the business, and other properties.

Somewhere along the line your spouse sits you and the 5 children down at the table with a gun and says either “you are going to kill everyone” or “you are only going to kill yourself”.
More than a year after the divorce is settled, you find out about a hearing that you were not party to. With no evidentiary hearing or finding of fact, Sheriffs inform you must be out of the house and cannot tell the children why. You drop the children off at school and go home and pack only the one bag that the Sheriff’s deputy will let you pack. Everything else is lost to you. The children are to be taken care of by an undisclosed third party. And you leave your home of 14 years.
A year later, during a hearing to restore the divorce agreement and regain custody of the children, your lawyer is arrested during the hearing for reasons yet unknown and you are told to leave, as obviously the hearing will not continue. You take the files and other property left in the court room so they do not become “lost”. You later learn that after you left, the Judge resumed the hearing with your lawyer in handcuffs, without glasses, shoes, files or a client….

Later you find that the children are back with your spouse, but two of them have run away and not been seen in months.
That should be enough to get your attention and peak your interest.
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.
Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe
With that literary appetizer consumed, this writer hopes that the reader will find this writer’s perspective unique and thought provoking enough to be moved to action.

This writer sat in the Federal Court room in St. Paul, MN on January 10, 2014 and heard Judge Susan Richard Nelson ask Lawyer Michelle McDonald to produce Case Law Citations from the Federal 8th Circuit Court. As this writer listened, the following thought began to take root in this writers mind:
  • Can anyone wearing black robes arbitrarily deprive any US citizen of their Unalienable Natural Law Rights?
And with that thought, this writer set about answering this question using this thought process from one of his favorite recurring tweets:
  • You know those neat tricks & observations they use to catch the bad guys in major media and Hollywood shows? You need to start using them on your government.
@DMashak on Twitter (abbreviations & truncations removed)
And so we begin to use those neat tricks and observations to try to make sense of what has transpired and how Federal Judge Susan Richard Nelson should rule. In the case of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, the facts of interest to this writer are....

To continue reading for free, please click here http://t.co/GHVbMEQ35j


Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.

Monday, January 20, 2014

MNJUDICIALTAR: The FBI, Operation COINTELPRO & Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr. Day (Part 1 of 3 - Intro & Sections 1&2)

On this Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday, this writer has chosen to provide you with a copy of the Senate Committee Report regarding the campaign to demonize, marginalize and discredit Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. Upon reading the content of this report, your esteem for the man should be exponentially increased upon understanding that the weight of the US Government, FBI, Law Enforcement and National Security Agencies were brought to bear upon him and against the Civil Rights Movement.

This writer further deems it necessary and appropriate public service to re-post this report as there seems to be a concerted effort by the government to take down web sites containing this reveal, enlightening, embarrassing and provocative information. (Several websites this writer has previously linked to no longer exist) This writer hopes that the many copies he posts on the Internet will allow Americans for at least the next 100 years to have access to this document which irrefutably demonstrates the true nature of our government and its attitude towards rank and file Americans in general, and the voices of political dissent in particular.
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free -
Johanne Wolfgang Von Goethe
This document goes a long way to erasing the deliberately false perception of reality rank and file America has of its government, Judicial System and Law Enforcement. A false perception of reality painted by our major media and Hollywood, at the direction the one and only one ruling class pretending to be two major political parties. The reader is asked to bookmark this page and make a special effort to commit an overview of the contents of this article to memory? Why? Because major media and Hollywood have an almost infinite amount of hours painting your false perception of reality, and this writer may only have this one shot make you conscious of a truer perspective of reality.

While major media and Hollywood paint a romanticized, benevolent picture of the FBI and Federal Law Enforcement, this report documents Law Enforcement and National Security organizations allowed to go rogue for the sole purpose of undermining the effectiveness of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in advancing the cause of civil rights.

However, the reader should realize that this activities extend to all voices of political dissent. At various times, Labor Unions, Political Parties, Political Groups (Communists), Tax Protesters and other voices of political dissent have been the targets of FBI, MLK-like COINTELPRO Operations. Here is another quote by FBI Director:
Purpose of counter-intelligence action is to disrupt [Black Panther Party] and it is immaterial whether facts exist to substantiate the charge. If facts are present it aids in the success of the proposal but the Bureau feels … that disruption can be accomplished without facts to back it up.
J Edgar Hoover, FBI Director 193?-1972 Memo (16 Sept. 1970)
The governments attitude towards rank and file Americans is perhaps best summed up by FBI Director Hoover, head of the FBI and its predecessor organization from 1924 until his death in 1972.
“Yet the individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.”
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, (January 1, 1895 – May 2, 1972) was the first Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of the United States. Appointed director of the Bureau of Investigation—predecessor to the FBI—in 1924, he was instrumental in founding the FBI in 1935, where he remained director until his death in 1972) The Elks Magazine, August 1956 http://goo.gl/KdzcyA
To this writers mind, it appears that this investigation was done and this committee report created only under intense political pressure. This writer speculates that the powers that be finally gave in and published the report knowing they controlled the major media and the report would likely languish unread (very many) in some file cabinet in an obscure back room of the Senate. No one concieved of the present day miracle of the internet which would make dissemination of such data cheap and easy for rank and file Americans in general, and the voices of politcal dissent in particular.

And as you read, please contemplate this: Who controls the FBI?  Our Government?  Someone outside the Government? The Political Party in control of the government at the time? Which political party was in control at the relevant time?  What is the true nature of our government? What is the true Nature of the FBI?  Who decides what political dissent should be oppressed? Can a "Too big to fail bank" give a legal bribe known as a campaign contribution (Shakespeare: A Rose by any other name would still smell as sweet) to suppress witnesses against it? What does political dissent mean? If someone has evidence of a crime committed by a "Too big to fail bank", can they ask the FBI to COINTELPRO the witness? Which side of the abortion debate should be subject to an FBI COINTELPRO Operation? Which side of the gay marriage debate should the FBI oppress? Should the FBI do COINTELPRO Ops on folks who complain about high taxes or Obamacare?  Has this writer made his point?

While the document is long, and sometimes dry and boring, this writer asks you to read at least the first two underlined paragraphs.

Without further adieu, in honor of Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr. this writer now re-posts:

SUPPLEMENTARY DETAILED STAFF REPORTS
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES AND THE
RIGHTS OF AMERICANS

_______
BOOK III
_______
FINAL REPORT

OF THE
SELECT COMMITTEE
TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS

WITH RESPECT TO

INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
UNITED STATES SENATE

APRIL 23 (under authority of the order of April 14), 1976

DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., CASE STUDY

I. INTRODUCTION

From December 1963 until his death in 1968, Martin Luther King, Jr. was the target of an intensive campaign by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to "neutralize" him as an effective civil rights leader. In the words of the man in charge of the FBI's "war" against Dr. King:
No holds were barred. We have used [similar] techniques against Soviet agents. [The same methods were] brought home against any organization against which we were targeted. We did not differentiate. This is a rough, tough business. 1
 The FBI collected information about Dr. King's plans and activities through an extensive surveillance program, employing nearly every intelligence-gathering technique at the Bureau's disposal. Wiretaps, which were initially approved by...

To continue reading for free, please click here http://t.co/v80G30jLxV
 
Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common 

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty, 

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE


End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

MNJUDICIALTAR: NSA Spying vs the Constitution: Is the FISA Court just stupid?

Last month, this writer reported that a Federal Judge had found the NSA's phone snooping unconstitutional as part of a series on Government Transparency and Accountability.
WHILE VISIONS OF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY DANCED IN THEIR HEADS (2 of 3) http://t.co/faELvykmrK
Despite earlier 1970's Case Law (Court Rulings), setting precedent for said NSA spying, Federal Judge Richard Leon ruled it unconstitutional. In this writer's opinion, correctly so.

But then Federal Judge William Pauley, ruled that NSA's phone snooping was constitutional citing the same 1970's Case Law establishing 3td Party Doctrine:
NSA phone records spying is constitutional, judge says http://wapo.st/1hJN5Kz
The 1970's Case Law (Court Ruling) 3rd Party Doctrine essentially says the following:
A person has no reasonable expectation of privacy if they willing transfer information to a third party.
In these particular instances the third parties are the telephone, telecommunications and/or internet companies. Your Government's position is that if you willingly give information to a third party, even if they are just the conduit of exchange to another person, you have no reasonable expectation of privacy.
FISA Court order that allowed NSA surveillance is revealed for first time http://gu.com/p/3kftz/tw
Now both Progressive Republicans and Progressive Democrats would have the story end there, but this writer is going to add to the mix common sense and true history.
“All government, in its essence, is a conspiracy against the superior man: its one permanent object is to oppress him and cripple him - H.L. Mencken
The Constitution was intended as an anchor to prevent the expansion of government power and the limitation of liberty of WE THE PEOPLE. The Founder's created our Government and Constitution with the nature of man in mind. Their beliefs as to the nature of man perhaps are best prescribed in Cato Letters 59 & 60:
People (men) under Natural Law have free will, and are not virtuous by nature. http://goo.gl/qeYr1
The Founder's crafted our Government knowing that persons not virtuous by nature would inhabit it over time, and by their nature would try to expand their power and restrict the liberty of WE THE PEOPLE. At that time, the concepts of Natural Law and Natural Rights were so engrained in our society, some of the Founder's argued there was no need to reduce certain Unalienable Natural Rights to writing, as they were self-evident truths.  In retrospect, it is a good thing certain of our unalienable Natural Rights were reduced to writing; else the basis for arguing would be much more difficult.  In this particular instance, Natural Law, as reduced to writing in the 4th Amendment, prescribes that WE THE PEOPLE should be "secure in our persons, houses and papers" and free from "unreasonable searches and seizures". (Proof our Country was founded on Natural Law http://t.co/rZswNupbeO )

But both the Republican and Democrat Progressives find the Constitution too constraining.  And so, they have sought to jettison the Constitutional Anchor that inhibits their non-virtuous desires and replace it with the more arbitrary Case Law.

From this writer's original article "While visions of transparency and accountability danced in their heads (2 of 3)" http://t.co/faELvykmrK:

In 1913, Progressive President Woodrow Wilson...

To continue reading for free, please click here: http://t.co/tTuNMdfAS8

Those were my thoughts.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.